Auckland Developer Convicted of RMA Breach

A prosecution of a land developer under the Resource Management Act by Auckland Council has resulted in a conviction and fine. It came about after repeated warnings and enforcement action by the Council.

The developer was fined $48,750 following unauthorised earthworks and failures to control sediment discharges on Auckland's North Shore.

The company was granted resource consent with conditions that included proper erosion and sediment management, stabilisation of bare areas and prevention of discharges onto public roads or neighbouring land. 

However, council inspections found ongoing non-compliance issues, despite repeated warnings and the issuance of an Abatement Notice. Sediment from the sites flowed onto neighbouring properties and into waterways.

The court rejected the company’s claim that it was only minimally responsible because contractors had carried out the work. The Judge found that as the landowner and an experienced property developer, the company had “turned a blind eye” to what was happening on its land and failed to take reasonable steps to prevent harm.  “It would not have taken a great effort to visit and check,” the Judge said.

Note: RMA fines are no longer insured under statutory liability insurance. However, the legal defence costs are and these are often substantial and could be greater even that the fine imposed.

Builtin Insurance

Post Archive

Post Categories

Fire & Emergency Levy Changes Effective 1st July

Fire & Emergency Levy Changes Effective 1st July

From 1st July the compulsory Fire & Emergency Levy collected on every contract of insurance that covers fire will change. In many cases this will result in a reduction in the levy payable. The exception is on light vehicles, those insured for third party only (previously not levied) and some commercial buildings.

read more...
Defective waterproof membrane application

Court confirms builders can’t delegate their duty of care for building code compliance

In a recent case the Court of Appeal found that builders who assume responsibility for construction are, like Councils and developers, generally subject to a legal duty to ensure compliance with the Building Code, even if they have delegated the work to subcontractors. The Building Act already makes this clear for residential building work and builders can’t contract out of it.

read more...